View in Browser Our Journalism Needs Your Support Please Donate Today
California Local Logo
Graphic which spells out The Newsletter.


By Sharan Street
Published Aug 08, 2022

What’s more arcane—the Mystery Spot, or Santa Cruz’s local government? What’s more arcane—the Mystery Spot, or Santa Cruz’s local government? Image credit: JHVEPhoto   Shutterstock

8-8-22: The Jury’s In

Even before California Local launched, we had already begun posting articles for the website. We put our focus on “explainers”—longer articles that provide information on the state’s government infrastructure. One aspect we tackled early on was the judicial branch in each county that we cover. We looked at the superior court systems, the district attorney’s office and the grand jury.

All these institutions are important, but it’s the role of the civil grand jury that is of particular interest to citizens who want to better understand how local government works (or doesn’t).


The People’s Court

California is the only state in the union with a constitution that requires counties to maintain civil grand juries. Unlike criminal grand juries, which are guided by prosecutors working for the district attorney, the civil grand jury’s job is to hold government itself accountable. Back in 2021, Jonathan Vankin looked at the civil grand jury tradition and its functions specifically in Santa Cruz County. 

Every year the Santa Cruz County Civil Grand Jury releases a series of reports that throw light on the inner workings of local agencies. These reports provide a wealth of information for local journalists, who cover some of the grand jury’s findings. But curious citizens can go straight to the source and absorb all the data. On the home page for the 2021-2022 Grand Jury Reports and Responses, there are links to five grand jury reports, plus the 2021-2022 Consolidated Final Report, which can be downloaded as a PDF.

Three of the reports focus specifically on county government functions, aligning with the grand jury’s mission to ensure that public servants stay accountable to the public. “Honoring Commitments to the Public” reviews responses to three of the four 2018–2019 Grand Jury reports—including one that led to the replacement of an “unwieldy contract with private sector attorneys with a dedicated Public Defender.” (Read more in this article by the Santa Cruz Sentinel.)

Two reports delved into different local measures: Measure S, a special tax that funded the Live Oak Library Annex, and Measure G, a one-half cent sales tax increase on transactions in unincorporated areas for 12 years (the latter has the piquant title “Words Matter: Did Measure G Mislead Voters?”).


The Grand Jury—Explained

The Santa Cruz civil grand jury meets in County Government Center
Santa Cruz’s civil grand jury promotes accountability in local government.

Fire and (No) Rain

The other reports focus on two subjects that are front of mind for Santa Cruz residents (and for that matter, Californians in general): fire and water. We have too much of one, not enough of the other.

On the first of these, the grand jury released “Reducing Our Community’s Risk From Wildfire.” There will be more to come from local journalists on this topic, particularly in the weeks ahead when the annual CZU fire anniversary rolls around, and also when the Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors responds to the grand jury’s report by Sept. 22.

But on the topic of water—and the shortages thereof—the grand jury released a report on May 24 titled “Our Water Account is Overdrawn,” which warns of a catastrophic outcome that if the county does not achieve drought resilience. The report proposes “achievable steps that can be taken toward drought resilience by our County water districts, city water departments, and groundwater basin agencies,” and it sets a deadline of Aug. 22 for “required responses” from the Santa Cruz and Watsonville city councils and the board of directors for the region’s water agencies.

This report on water management caught the attention of local reporters, with headlines cropping up in various news sites. A July 29 article by Jesse Kathan of Santa Cruz Local presents a comprehensive look at the report's findings, and also offers a map of local water districts, water sources and agencies. It’s a must-read for anyone seeking to understand Santa Cruz’s water management woes.

To augment this well-done piece of journalism, dip into California Local’s Explainers on the local water landscape (see below). Matt Renda writes about the peculiarities of Santa Cruz’s water supply. Due to its relative geographic isolation, hemmed in by ocean and mountains, it is one of the few California communities that relies on water from local rainfall. And Jonathan Vankin digs into a short primer on the state’s wildly complicated water delivery systems before detailing the 10 special districts whose primary function is managing and delivering water supply in Santa Cruz County, along with the municipal water departments in Santa Cruz and Watsonville.


Santa Cruz County Water, Explained

In Santa Cruz County, 10 separate entities manage the water supply.
Santa Cruz County's water system is run by a decentralized collection of entities.

Where’s Our Water?

The city of Santa Cruz gets just over 20 percent of its water from Loch Lomond in the mountain community of Lompico.
Santa Cruz is one of the few California communities that receive 100 percent of its water from local rainfall.

$ Marks the Spots

Finally, the photo above of Santa Cruz’s Mystery Spot is not entirely apropos of nothing. It’s one of 10 different family-friendly tourist attractions featured in a new article on California Local—including one new park that offers something free to do in pricy San Francisco.


Cheaper Thrills

The newly opened Presidio Tunnel Tops provides free entertainment in pricy San Francisco.
California has some top-notch tourist attractions—with top-shelf prices. Here are some that won’t break the bank.


Impact Report Image for decorative use