πŸ… 🍷 πŸŒ€ πŸŒ€ πŸ˜‘ πŸŒ€ πŸŒ€ πŸ˜‘ πŸ… πŸ˜‘ πŸŒ€ πŸ˜‘ πŸ… πŸŒ€ πŸŒ€ πŸ… πŸŒ€ πŸŒ€ πŸ˜‘ πŸ˜‘ πŸ˜‘ πŸŒ€ πŸŒ€ πŸ… πŸ˜‘ πŸŒ€ πŸŒ€ πŸ˜‘ πŸŒ€ πŸ˜‘ πŸ˜‘ πŸ… πŸ… πŸ˜‘ πŸ˜‘ πŸŒ€ πŸŒ€ πŸŒ€ πŸ˜‘ 😊 πŸŒ€ πŸŒ€ πŸ… πŸ˜‘ πŸŒ€ ✊ πŸ˜‘ πŸ˜‘ πŸŒ€ πŸŒ€ πŸŒ€ πŸ˜‘ πŸ… πŸŒ€ πŸ… πŸ… πŸ˜‘ πŸŒ€ πŸ˜‘ πŸ…

Santa Cruz County Discussion:
Santa Cruz County Crowdsourced Bicycle Route Map Layer


Santa Cruz County Crowdsourced Bicycle Route Map Layer
For discussion about safe bicycle routes in Santa Cruz County and the crowdsourced bicycle map layer for the county.

Local bicycle commuters are encouraged to add input and feedback about getting around quickly and safely.
Know of a great route that’s not on the map? Start a discussion thread! Describe the route, and once the description is seconded/vetted, a member of the edit team will add it to the map.
Have a comment or question about an existing route segment or feature marker on the map?
Click on it to display its info window, and copy the ID at the bottom, and use that ID to refer to the segment or marker in discussions here.

← Back to discussion topic

Posted by πŸ˜‘ Brian DiGiorgio (Santa Cruz County) • May 16, 2022

UCSC bike path feeder roads (McHenry, Steinhart, Meyer, Kerr)

There are several streets through UCSC campus that funnel people into the bike path. McHenry, Steinhart, and Kerr are all steep hilly streets without any lane markings that cross campus and are frequented by bikers and pedestrians with only limited car traffic. None of these roads have any bike infrastructure, but vehicle traffic is limited so they are probably LTS 3. The end of Meyer feeds directly into the start of the bike path, but it has more car traffic so it is probably LTS 3 or 4.


4 comments have been posted. 1 πŸ‘   •   0 πŸ‘Ž
Sign in to share your thoughts.
  • Top level comment icon πŸŒ€ Chris Neklason (Santa Cruz County) • Posted May 26, 2022, 8:10 a.m.

    These have been added to the map, thanks. Any thoughts on Heller & McLaughlin, Hagar, etc?

     
  • Top level comment icon πŸ˜‘ Brian DiGiorgio (Santa Cruz County) • Posted May 23, 2022, 9:58 a.m.

    I was kind of torn when looking at the formal definitions of LTS that were linked. On one hand, there is no formal bike infrastructure whatsoever on any of the roads. You just have to ride in the middle of the road with no lines or barriers between you and any cars. On the other hand, there are very few cars that actually drive on these routes (except Meyer) so I don't feel any traffic stress when biking there. You can decide whether traffic or infrastructure should take precedent.

     
    • Comment reply thread icon πŸŒ€ Chris Neklason (Santa Cruz County) • Posted May 25, 2022, 3:19 p.m.

      Yeah, it all comes down to a subjective sense of stress on the part of a rider. A narrow road with good viz and low car traffic might warrant a 2, especially with younger adult riders with good reflexes. Will give it a look on maps and street view and plug them into the system. Thanks for the routes!

       
  • Top level comment icon πŸŒ€ Chris Neklason (Santa Cruz County) • Posted May 16, 2022, 3:07 p.m.

    Thanks Brian. Can any other UCSC cyclists chime in on these? LTS 3 and 4 is a high degree of stress/required caution with low car traffic.

     

Follow the Code

  • Use of your real name is required.
  • Participation on this site is bound by local, state and federal law.
  • Do not resort to ad hominem attacks. No insulting or name-calling.
  • Do not not impugn motives of others.
  • When assertions of fact are made, it's okay to respectfully request someone cite their sources. Be ready to cite yours.
  • A civil tone is required.

Failure to follow the code can result in suspension of privileges and account termination.

Members are solely responsible for their contributions in accordance with our terms of service.

Join Us Today!